This study aimed to assess the impact of two commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (CHY1 and CHY2) on the intestinal health and performance of weaned piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli during the nursery phase. One hundred ninety-two piglets with an average weight of 6.70 ± 0.92 kilograms were allocated in a randomized block design to one of four treatments: a negative control (C) without E. coli challenge and no yeast supplementation; a positive control (CH) with E. coli challenge and no yeast supplementation; and two treatment groups receiving an E. coli challenge with a CHY1 and CHY2 yeast strain supplementation. The challenge involved inoculating piglets with two dosages of E. coli F4 (106 CFU/ml and 109 CFU/ml) and a saline solution for the C group. Samples of intestinal tissue, blood, and cecal content were collected on the trial’s 11th, 28th, and 42nd days. All variables were subjected to analysis of variance, and upon detecting significant differences via the F-test (p < 0.05), Tukey’s test was applied to compare treatment means. For the analysis of diarrhea occurrence, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. When variables were rejected at a 5% probability level, a Dunn’s test was conducted as a post-hoc analysis for paired multiple comparisons (p < 0.05), with statistical significance set at this level. Weaned piglets supplemented with CHY1 exhibited superior performance metrics, including higher average daily gain (15.3% increase), body weight (3.4% increase), feed-to-gain ratio (9.5% increase), and average daily feed intake (12.3% increase) at 28 days compared to the CH group across two different nutritional phases. No discernible effects were observed on measuring blood parameters, intestinal morphology, or cecal short-chain fatty acids. Both yeast-treated groups displayed improved performance during the most challenging periods. However, the CHY1 yeast strain contributed to enhanced piglet performance in the initial 28 days without inducing changes in intestinal morphology.
This study aimed to assess the impact of two commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (CHY1 and CHY2) on the intestinal health and performance of weaned piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli during the nursery phase. One hundred ninety-two piglets with an average weight of 6.70 ± 0.92 kilograms were allocated in a randomized block design to one of four treatments: a negative control (C) without E. coli challenge and no yeast supplementation; a positive control (CH) with E. coli challenge and no yeast supplementation; and two treatment groups receiving an E. coli challenge with a CHY1 and CHY2 yeast strain supplementation. The challenge involved inoculating piglets with two dosages of E. coli F4 (106 CFU/ml and 109 CFU/ml) and a saline solution for the C group. Samples of intestinal tissue, blood, and cecal content were collected on the trial’s 11th, 28th, and 42nd days. All variables were subjected to analysis of variance, and upon detecting significant differences via the F-test (p < 0.05), Tukey’s test was applied to compare treatment means. For the analysis of diarrhea occurrence, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. When variables were rejected at a 5% probability level, a Dunn’s test was conducted as a post-hoc analysis for paired multiple comparisons (p < 0.05), with statistical significance set at this level. Weaned piglets supplemented with CHY1 exhibited superior performance metrics, including higher average daily gain (15.3% increase), body weight (3.4% increase), feed-to-gain ratio (9.5% increase), and average daily feed intake (12.3% increase) at 28 days compared to the CH group across two different nutritional phases. No discernible effects were observed on measuring blood parameters, intestinal morphology, or cecal short-chain fatty acids. Both yeast-treated groups displayed improved performance during the most challenging periods. However, the CHY1 yeast strain contributed to enhanced piglet performance in the initial 28 days without inducing changes in intestinal morphology. Section, Keywords, Keywords, Keywords, Keywords, Keywords